I investigate how vision-language models fail — geometrically, semantically, and adversarially — to make them more robust, interpretable, and trustworthy.
My research sits at the intersection of representation geometry, adversarial machine learning, and multimodal AI safety. I study how vision-language models encode information — and crucially, how that encoding breaks down.
Current work targets adversarial vulnerabilities in BLIP-2, LLaVA-1.5, and Qwen-VL, probing teacher-forcing gaps, gradient dilution, and Q-Former bottleneck effects through a mechanistic interpretability lens.
Earlier work revealed surprising geometric properties of ViT embedding spaces: equivalence structures, inverted LID behavior, and cross-modal semantic misalignment — findings with direct implications for model safety and robustness evaluation.
* equal contribution · Montasir Shams in bold